Stage: 1

Champions:

• Ashley Claymore (@acutmore)
• Jordan Harband (@ljharb)
• Chris de Almeida (@ctcpip)
• TBC: Rick Waldron (@rwaldron)

Authors:

• Alexander J. Vincent (@ajvincent)
• Ashley Claymore (@acutmore)

await on individual properties creates a waterfall, rather than running requests in parallel:

const obj = {
  shape: await getShape(),
  color: await getColor(),
  mass: await getMass(),
};

Promise.all helps, but is based on order, rather than names, which could lead to mixups:

const [
  color,
  shape,
  mass,
] = await Promise.all([
  getShape(),
  getColor(),
  getMass(),
]);

Solutions using existing syntax can be verbose and pollute the number of variables in scope:

const shapeRequest = getShape();
const colorRequest = getColor();
const massRequest = getMass();

const shape = await shapeRequest;
const color = await colorRequest;
const mass = await massRequest;

const {
  shape,
  color,
  mass,
} = await Promise.ownProperties({
  shape: getShape(),
  color: getColor(),
  mass: getMass(),
});

const {
  shape,
  color,
  mass,
} = await Promise.fromEntries(Object.entries({
  shape: getShape(),
  color: getColor(),
  mass: getMass(),
}));

http://bluebirdjs.com/docs/api/promise.props.html

https://github.com/slorber/combine-promises

https://github.com/sindresorhus/p-props

None.

None.

Q: Why not a deep-copy option?

A: Deep copy traditionally has been left out of JavaScript for a number of reasons. While a recursive promise walking API might be possible, combining it with this feels overcomplicated and unlikely to pass TC39's smell tests.

Q: Why not all keys?

A: This implies walking the prototype chain. Note this proposal would have been Promise.allProperties() originally, but that naming confuses what the polyfill does above with that intended use case. Plus, if a prototype has promises on it, then how would we safely construct the prototype of the resulting object? Going down the prototype chain opens a can of worms.

Q: What about symbol keys?

A: We haven't really talked about them yet. That said, Object.entries(), for better or for worse, only considers string keys.